Awhile ago there was a brief post on Fark.com about gaming in libraries (if you haven’t heard, it’s becoming a pretty widespread phenomenon). And the comments from the peanut gallery that followed were really…disheartening – lots of ignorant/outdated/plain wrong ideas about what kinds of spaces libraries are supposed to be, and plenty of derogatory ones about libraries and librarians trying too hard (in that ‘just fall over and die already, won’t you’ vein). Really, they were exactly the kind of thing I read too much of while we had our referendum site up – lots of negativity of the sort that makes you wonder why you’re doing what you’re doing if no one cares and you’re widely despised throughout the community. Granted, the people leaving the negative comments weren’t making the most out of their library use (or maybe I just assume this because if they only knew how wonderful it was…they couldn’t/wouldn’t say the things they said), and there were so many other people who called or stopped in after the referendum failed to commiserate and to say that they’d voted for it.
I try not to get too upset when I run across library-hate/ignorance – especially when it comes from people who are angry about their taxes in general and seem to be under the mistaken impression that we’re in league with the school district and receive all kinds of funding from/through them. This time around we tried to do a lot more education about where the library gets its funding, how its used, how additional tax monies would be used to improve the quality of service/experience at the library, etc.. But there are people who aren’t going to listen to that either. So. There’s only so much energy one should put into anger and frustration and fist-shaking. I had my own private little rant on Notepad, which I deleted after I felt better. There are plenty of library advocates who have said it better than me MANY times before. But then we had this meeting to discuss cost-saving measures we could adopt in the future to keep the library up and running (and there are so many other reasons that that was frustrating), and it turns out that many of our library staff have no idea what our purpose is. If *we* don’t even know what it is that we’re trying to achieve, how can we expect to pass that vision along to our users?
The most vocal of these, naturally, was sitting *right* behind me, proudly proclaiming her ignorance in my ear. I was so angry I couldn’t speak. Except to excuse myself to get away from her for a few minutes. So, what’d she say that got my panties all in a twist? Basically that our “business” was checkouts. And that nothing else really mattered. And that the only measure of our success was how many of those we performed, and whether those numbers were on the increase in comparison with previous fiscal years. Even the library director was taken aback. She said, “That’s not ALL we do.” Oh, she needed to have said so much more. And it’s festering in my head that I didn’t say more at that point. It’s going to be one of those things where it continues to bug me until I *do*, and I only hope that I can manage to be composed and rational when it finally bursts out of me. Maybe this is that opportunity.
So what are libraries to the people that use them? Are they just these repositories of stuff you can take home for free? In some cases and to some people, yes. But they also offer programs, events, classes, other services for low or no cost to their patrons – for personal interest, career development, enjoyment, education… Libraries provide access to computers, computer applications, software, the Internet, and in many cases other technology/gadgets – scanners, digital cameras, video cameras, sound/video editing equipment, card readers. Librarians help people find information they’re looking for, good books to read, movies to watch (so they don’t have to use Netflix or Blockbuster), music. Librarians provide research assistance, homework help, computer troubleshooting, friendly conversation, directions to anyplace (thank you Yahoo maps/Google maps/Mapquest, legal and tax forms. They lead book discussions, they help you update your MySpace, they help you type up and send out your resume, they know where MS Word 2007 is hiding its print command (they’ll even show you). And some librarians are offering programs that go beyond the usual storytimes for the young, and tax help for the old – they’re providing gaming programs (table top and console) for teens, tweens, seniors, and young adults in their 20s and 30s who may have ceased to see the library as *their* space. They want to know how it’s relevant to them. For plenty of people, the library is a place they can come to hang out – a place to meet their friends to study, or for tutoring, or to find a job, or to read the newspapers/magazines in front of the fire place. It’s a community space.
So, when this woman behind me says we should lose all the seating and tables in the public areas to make room for the ever-expanding collection, I’m shocked and appalled. No. You can’t just make the library a retail location. Then no one has a chance to form any kind of attachment to the place. We’re not just about the checkouts, we’re also an experience. You want people to linger, to relax, to enjoy being there – not to just get in, checkout and leave.
When I was at Harper College the other day, I spent a little over an hour sitting in the library. I wandered over to a table by the windows and caught up on my correspondence. When I’d had enough sunlight, I sat down at a computer and checked my email, plotted a course/map for the rest of the day, and updated my journal. I used to spend hours in the computer labs when I was in college (which were in the libraries), and hours more studying (or socializing) in the library proper. One morning at Harper reminded me how much I miss that experience. And how much I miss working in a library that provides a multiplicity of spaces to meet the needs of all kinds of users – quiet study areas, group study rooms, computer *labs*. And what about just going to the library to take in the atmosphere? Ours is so crowded and so noisy sometimes, it’s like “WHAT atmosphere? This place is toxic!”
I had a chance to talk with someone else the following day, and when she agreed with me (that the library is so much more than its checkouts), I felt so much better. And the desire to carve that woman’s heart out of her chest with my staple remover was ever so slightly diminished.



9 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 23, 2009 at 5:27 pm
oberonthefool
Stupid persons! Libraries are teh awesome!
Although some are more awesome than others… I tend, like you, to prefer coziness and variety in my libraries.
That said, I don’t spend nearly as much time at my local one as I should… maybe I should get rid of my computer and just use the ones there instead…
Nah.
February 23, 2009 at 7:52 pm
kaysootee
Nah, indeed. For certain things this would work well, and for others? Like that extensive collection of naughty bits you have…not so much.
Back in the day when I was in college, our network admin was this guy, Ira, and there was this policy about not mudding or mushing or whathaveyou (and probably most people didn’t have a clue what that was, anyway – I didn’t really). I used to spend a lot of time telnetting to somewhere else, because I wanted to use this chat service thing with another friend of mine and I couldn’t do it through our network. Obviously, I’m forgetting the specifics. And Ira would send me messages to try and feel out what I was doing to see if I was getting around the no mudding *policy.* And all of this technological skill I was demonstrating was not at all mine – it was through the auspices of my geeky boyfriends. Thanks to aarons and fostema and carlina for getting me online, outfitted, and consequently investigated.
The guy who taught my yoga class tonight tells me that he voted for the referendum. Hooray! He also said I had “perfect alignment” which made me all glowy with pride.
February 23, 2009 at 8:05 pm
oberonthefool
You are perfectly aligned! Have you begun coaxing the linergy up through your chakra-gates yet?
Why did they care about mudding in the library?
February 23, 2009 at 9:08 pm
kaysootee
Maybe it tied up too many resources or computers? I’m not really sure. It was something that I’m sure the ubergeeks could easily get around if they wanted to.
February 23, 2009 at 9:47 pm
JohnM
Thanks for the rant! Fred would be proud. Sometimes I get depressed that LIS students aren’t passionate about libraries anymore – some of them are so cynical; “what-everrr, I just want a *job*”….
I am, as you know, a big fan of library tourism – I always look for the library whenever I visit a new place. I’m still grateful for your tour of the DP library (yay, poet-tree!), and seeing the Lake Geneva PL on our excursion. That was the most libraries ever in one trip, actually – Woodstock, yours, UFL, CPL, Grainger, etc.
One time? Ok, one time? We were driving through Kankakee trying to find the shortcut over to I-55, and I spied the library, pulled over, and got excellent directions in about 2 minutes. Librarians Know Stuff.
February 23, 2009 at 11:23 pm
kaysootee
I am also a fan of library tourism – even before I was a librarian. Peloquin and I made many pilgrimages to libraries we’d never visited before – to check out the atmosphere. And that was one of my favorite parts of Fred’s library buildings class – the Field Trip To Other Libraries. I like to explore.
Worst patron joke today: “Know what the difference is between Borders and the library?” “No, what?” “A good cup of coffee.”
Ha ha ha. Not. All I said was, “Where would we put the coffee bar?” gesturing to the general lack of space for anything. I think he meant to be funny. But it only emphasized to me yet AGAIN that some (most?) people have no idea what we do. I almost brought up how you have to pay for everything you request at Borders (maybe we should start doing that), but eh. Should I be engaging the ignorant in dialogue as much as possible? Or will they just resent my efforts to help them understand?
I will ask this little gray bunny. “Little gray bunny! What would *you* do?”
Ow. The little gray bunny has bitten my ankle. I shall henceforth bite the ankles (or, whatever I can reach) of those who displease me. Watch out, world.
February 24, 2009 at 4:18 pm
oberonthefool
One of the conversations that has been ongoing in the indie game design community is about how people tend not to ascribe value to things that they don’t have to pay for; where conversely, they do ascribe value to things that they do have to pay for. This appears to hold true regardless of the relative value of the actual thing or service in question.
I wonder if that lies in the same psychological territory as my issues with favors/obligations…
February 25, 2009 at 7:33 am
kaysootee
I don’t know what that has to do with your favors/obligations. You just don’t like being relied upon. Whether it’s because you resent it, or because it’s too much responsibility, or what, I dunno. Or are you suggesting that obligations allow people to use you for free? And they never appreciate your efforts?
I had this thought the other night about being paid to do things that I love. And how that hasn’t worked out as well as I thought it might, because part of what I love about them is the freedom and the choice to do them when and where and how I want to do them. And having them as a job has meant that there are always other people dictating to some extent (or myself in that role as taskmaster of me) what I can do and how I can do it. Which, I guess, takes all the fun out of it. Or there are too many other things that I don’t like that come bundled with the experience (like the some of the software that comes with prepackaged computers or some of the e-journals they bundle with subscriptions to others).
When I told my friend back in college that I wanted to do something I really cared about, he said, “Kay, those things are *hobbies*. Do them on your own time. Find something else you can do as a job.” I didn’t know how to take that. But you know what? If I have to do stuff on my “own time” then I want as much of that as possible. I don’t think that I can be adequately compensated for giving my time away. Because it’s not like they can give it back if the transaction doesn’t work out for us. Money, however, stays in motion. I’ll think about this some more, perhaps.
February 25, 2009 at 7:06 pm
oberonthefool
I dunno. Being relied upon is a lose/lose prospect. I know that’s horribly cynical, but experience rarely creates optimists. I don’t think that makes me a bad person- I like doing things for people, I just don’t like being obligated to do things for people. I’d rather it be clear beyond any doubt that what I do is my choice, my own generosity, rather than any perceived sense of duty. With the exception of holding down a job, naturally- but that’s a different axis as far as I’m concerned.
I totally agree with you about the job/enjoyment thing. I don’t spend much recreational time outdoors anymore, since by the time I get home I’ve had my fill of being outside. On the one hand, I get to be outside all day, which is nice. On the other hand, I have to be outside all day, which isn’t always so nice. Being caught in the rain while one is out frolicking is one thing. Being caught in the rain while you’re stuck on a roof for two hours, knowing you’ll be soaked to the skin all day is quite another.
Your friend might have had a good point.
“I don’t think that I can be adequately compensated for giving my time away.” Amen, sister.